The Green Bay Packers beat the Tennessee Titans 30–14 on September 22, 2024, at Nissan Stadium in Nashville. It was a clear win. The Packers were strong on offense and even better on defense. This game also had a story: quarterback Malik Willis faced his former team and played very well. In this article, we will go through the key numbers, best players, and the big moments that shaped the result.
Final score and quick facts
- Final: Packers 30, Titans 14
- Quarter by quarter: GB 17–3–7–3; TEN 7–0–7–0
- Venue: Nissan Stadium, Nashville
Team stats at a glance
The Packers controlled the game in the main numbers. They finished with 378 total yards against the Titans’ 237. Green Bay ran the ball well and stayed on the field longer. Tennessee struggled to move the ball and protect the quarterback. Here are the headline team stats:
- Total yards: GB 378, TEN 237
- Passing yards: GB 190, TEN 204
- Rushing yards: GB 188, TEN 33
- Sacks (allowed): GB 3 (12 yards), TEN 8 (56 yards)
- Time of possession: GB 32:28, TEN 27:32
- Penalties: GB 10 for 75 yards, TEN 2 for 15 yards
What these numbers mean
Green Bay’s balance was key. With 188 rushing yards, the Packers could keep the Titans’ defense on the field and set up play-action passes. The Titans had only 33 rushing yards, so they became one-dimensional. When a team cannot run, the pass rush can attack. That is exactly what happened as the Packers’ defense produced eight sacks and disrupted many drives.
Malik Willis: a calm, efficient day
This game was special for Malik Willis. He used to play for the Titans. Now he wears green and gold. Against his former team, he was efficient and smart:
- Passing: 13 completions on 19 attempts, 202 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT
- Rushing: 6 carries, 73 yards, 1 TD
These numbers show a clean passing day and dangerous runs when the defense gave space. He did not force throws and avoided turnovers. That helped Green Bay control the pace.
The reports after the game called it his best performance as a pro. It was also a “revenge” moment, but Willis kept his focus on the team result, not on payback.
Will Levis: up-and-down with pressure in his face

Will Levis of the Titans threw for yards but had a hard day under pressure:
- Passing: 26/34, 260 yards, 2 TD, 2 INT
- Sacks taken: 8, for 56 yards lost
The box score shows solid accuracy and two scores. But the sacks and picks hurt long drives. When a quarterback is sacked eight times, many series end early or in poor field position. Those negative plays made it hard for Tennessee to come back.
Packers’ playmakers who helped
- Emanuel Wilson (GB): Scored on a 30-yard TD catch from Willis. It was a key third-quarter play that stretched the lead and changed momentum.
- Christian Watson (GB): Was part of a steady group effort. Green Bay spread the ball around. Seven different Packers had a catch in this game, which kept the Titans off balance.
- Brayden Narveson (GB): The rookie kicker added multiple field goals, supporting the offense when drives stalled. Consistent kicking kept pressure on Tennessee.
Titans’ best moments
Even in a loss, the Titans had bright spots:
- DeAndre Hopkins (TEN): 6 receptions, 73 yards, 1 TD. He remains a reliable target who can win one-on-one plays.
- Nick Vannett (TEN): Caught a touchdown from Levis, showing the tight end group can be a red-zone factor.
However, the Titans’ run game was almost shut down at 33 yards on 11 carries. When a team cannot run, the defense can sit on routes and blitz more. That helped produce the sacks and interceptions.
The turning points
- Early surge by the Packers
Green Bay scored 17 points in the first quarter and took control. Playing with a lead allowed them to lean on the run and choose safe throws. It also forced the Titans to pass more, which fed the Packers’ pass rush. - Defensive dominance
The Packers’ defense posted eight sacks and two interceptions. One pick became points directly. Defensive havoc like this often swings a game, and it did here. - Willis’ dual threat
The QB added a rushing TD and kept drives alive with his legs. Those extra yards on scrambles broke the Titans’ contain and made third downs easier.
Drive style and coaching choices
Green Bay’s plan was simple: run first, pass when needed. They had 37 rushing attempts and only 19 passes. That run-heavy style lowered risk and shortened the game. It also kept the Titans’ offense waiting on the sideline. Coach Matt LaFleur praised Willis and the group for executing the plan and staying patient.
Tennessee, by contrast, had to chase the score. With the run game stuck, they leaned on quick throws and shot plays. The passing numbers looked fine, but the sacks and turnovers were too much to overcome.
Box-score standouts and small details
- Third-down efficiency: Packers 5/14; Titans 3/9. Green Bay did just enough to extend drives. Tennessee could not stay on the field.
- First downs: Titans actually had 18 to the Packers’ 16. But first downs without points do not win games; negative plays killed too many Titans drives.
- Penalties: The Packers had 10 flags for 75 yards. Even with that, their defense and rushing attack covered the mistakes. The Titans had only 2 penalties, but they gave up sacks and turnovers, which are more damaging than flags.
What the stats say about both teams
- Packers: When they run the ball well and play strong defense, they look hard to beat. An efficient Willis, plus a punishing pass rush, is a winning mix. They do need to reduce penalties, but the core is solid.
- Titans: Protecting the quarterback must be the top fix. With eight sacks allowed and little rushing support, the offense had to climb a steep hill. The talent at receiver is there, but the line and run game must improve.
Why this game matters
This match told us two things. First, Malik Willis can manage a game and make impact plays. That is important while Jordan Love recovers from a knee issue, and it gives the Packers a dependable plan. Second, the Titans need balance. If they find a run game and keep Levis clean, the passing talent can shine. These are real, practical lessons pulled from credible reports and official stats.
Key player stat lines (quick list)
- Malik Willis (GB, QB): 13/19, 202 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT; 73 rush yards, 1 TD
- Will Levis (TEN, QB): 26/34, 260 yards, 2 TD, 2 INT; sacked 8 times
- DeAndre Hopkins (TEN, WR): 6 catches, 73 yards, 1 TD
- Emanuel Wilson (GB, RB/WR): TD reception from 30 yards
Final takeaway
This was a clean, strong win for the Packers. They ran the ball, avoided turnovers, and played fierce defense. The Titans showed fight, and they have playmakers, but they must fix pass protection and find a ground attack. The stats paint a clear picture, and all trusted sources agree on the main story: Green Bay earned the win with balance and pressure, and Malik Willis led the way against his former team.
FAQs
- What was the final score?
Packers 30, Titans 14. - When and where was the game played?
September 22, 2024, at Nissan Stadium, Nashville, Tennessee. - Who was the Packers’ quarterback in this game?
Malik Willis started and played very well against his former team. - What were Malik Willis’ stats?
He went 13/19 for 202 yards and 1 TD, plus 73 rushing yards and 1 rushing TD. - How did Will Levis perform?
He was 26/34 for 260 yards and 2 TD, but he threw 2 interceptions and took 8 sacks. - Which team had more total yards?
The Packers with 378 yards; the Titans had 237. - Why did the Titans lose despite some passing success?
They could not run, and they allowed eight sacks and two picks, which killed drives. - Who scored key touchdowns for Green Bay?
Malik Willis had a rushing TD and a TD pass to Emanuel Wilson. The defense also created points with takeaways. - Were penalties a problem for Green Bay?
Yes. The Packers had 10 penalties for 75 yards, but they still won thanks to rushing and defense. - Where can I check the full box score and play-by-play?
You can view it on ESPN, Pro-Football-Reference, and the Titans’ official game center.
Relatable topic : tennessee titans vs buffalo bills match player stats tampa bay buccaneers vs new york giants, miami dolphins vs green bay packers match player stats










































